Extended essay criteria for the extended essay (First exams May 2018)

Criteria A: Focus and method

The research question is excellent as an extended essay topic and the candidate outlines the research process in a very effective manner.  The research question is expressed as a question and has a clear objective, allowing the candidates obvious technical knowledge to be demonstrated. In terms of sources there is a significant reliance on primary sources which were detailed and specific enough to help the candidate.  The secondary data addresses the specific research question.  (6 / 6 marks). 

Criteria B: Knowledge and understanding

The candidate clearly has an excellent grasp of the relevant subject matter and applies complex 'interdependence theory' to coffees shops in his hometown.  The primary data which is sufficient to answer the question and the way that the candidate takes the Sigbjørn Atle Berg equation (used in the banking industry) and applies it to coffee shops is very skilful.  (6 / 6 marks).

Criteria C: Evaluation

This criterion assesses the extent to which critical-thinking skills have been used to analyse and evaluate the research undertaken.  The research completed during the essay is more than adequate and builds on the relevant work, compiled by Sigbjørn Atle Berg.  Throughout the essay the discussion is supported by the evidence provided.

The strengths and weaknesses of the research completed were addressed but in sufficient depth to reach the top higher mark band. 

(11 / 12 marks)

Criteria D: Presentation

The essay is well structured and easy to read and all of the primary research is cited correctly.  Definitions are included in the main body of the essay and the reference section appears to contain only the works used in the essay. (4 out of 4 marks).

Criteria E: Engagement

This is a new engagement criteria and throughout the extended essay process this candidate had a well thought out plan and followed through with this process.  The candidate also demonstrated a level of engagement during the writing and research process and was able to articulate their thoughts and research during the three reflection periods they had had with their supervisor.  (6 / 6 marks)

Overall score and grade.

The overall score for this essay was 33 out of a maximum score of 34.  In the year of the submission this essay was awarded a grade A.