InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

Paper 1: Sample Response 14 (Aspen Trees)

 Reading task

This sample response comes from the November 2020 examination session.  It is - like Sample Response 13 - a modified version of an "old" exam to fit the new Paper 1 requirements. A guiding question was created and the student completed this under strict mock examination protocols.  

Because we can't reprint the actual examination (IB or others own the copyright), I've linked the webpage here.  It's not an exact replica of the exam paper, as the exam included the heading of the online newspaper, but it's a very close approximation.  

There is so much this model example does right.  There's a clear focus on the question.  Perhaps, in this case, it might get too repetitive and over-the-top here in that singular focus.  There's consistent analysis of the writer's choices.  It's organized and developed.  What's missing - and this is hard in the new examinations - is a fuller understanding of the purpose(s) and audience in relation to the question.  In other words, while audience, purpose, and context are not front and center anymore, and there's not a need to explicitly deal with them, not fully dealing with the bigger picture can be limiting in some cases, in some exams.  The response would have been even better had it taken a bit of a broader approach at times.     

Even with those criticisms, as students prepare for their examinations, this model example shows them how to be hyper-focused, analytical, and detailed in what they write.   

Sample Guided Textual Analysis

Guided Textual Analysis (Aspen Trees)

Guiding question: How does the writer use style and/or tone to shape the reader's understanding and appreciation of the aspen trees?

Paper 1 Sample Response (Aspen Trees)

In our everyday lives, we pass by trees so often we rarely give them a second thought. This is very different however for Beth Dodd, a local naturalist from Woodland Park, Colorado. This article written for “The Mountain Jackpot News” by Beth Dodd in February of 2015 describes the “bud burst,” the process by which trees regain their leaves suddenly in spring. This descriptive and informative text is aimed at those living near Colorado, who are English speaking and have an interest in plants, notably aspen trees. Throughout this article, Dodd employs both an emotive and factual tone to allow readers to appreciate Aspen trees in the way the author does.

                  Firstly, Dodd uses a tone of admiration to reveal the beauty of aspen trees. This is first seen when Dodd cites that its leaves “glow in the sun.”  This description creates vivid imagery of leaves bathed in sunlight, which is an ethereal and almost heaven-like image. The readers are able to imagine these leaves, as it is a simple image and one that they have almost certainly seen but never fully appreciated. Dodd then further describes the leaves as “precious” and “brilliant green.”  Dodd’s use of these positive and tender words reveal her admiration of the leaves and their beauty. Then, Dodd personifies the leaves by noticing their “bright color and dancing movements,” to create an image of beautiful and glowing aspen trees.  The human-like movements given to the leaves by Dodd emphasises her admiration for the Aspen trees, by seeing them as beings capable of human movement. Also, the repetition of brilliance is seen again in Dodd’s description of the leaves, which adds to the beauty of the trees.

                  Next, Dodd uses an academic tone to inform the readers of the complex biological mechanisms behind the aspen trees. The use of scientific language such as Dodd’s repeated mention of the word “chlorophyll” serves to enlighten readers on the fascinating science behind trees: Chlorophyll is a green pigment that is found in chloroplasts to help them photosynthesise. Furthermore, the process of photosynthesis, described by Dodd as “absorb[ing] sunlight and help[ing] transform it into sugars” is yet again use of scientific and academic words to describe the fascinating way in which aspen trees make their own food. As humans can’t make their own food from sunlight, Dodd’s mention of this makes reader’s develop a sense of wonder for the aspen trees, as the scientific process seem like a superpower. Additionally, Dodd mentions a “surge of hormones” and “enzymes,” both add to the academic language used in this article.  Both enzymes and hormones are also found in the human body, and hence Dodd connects readers to the aspen trees by highlighting the biological molecules which they have in common. Therefore, Dodd’s academic tone commands respect for the Aspen trees and informs them that the trees are much more complex than what meets the eye.

                  In addition to using a scientific tone, Dodd also employs a factual tone to allow readers to appreciate the human-like nature of aspen trees. The factual and logical tone is made evident when Dodd explains that the trees “ruthlessly sever them” (indicating their leaves in winter) in order to “avoid death by starvation or dehydration.”  This logical tone set up by Dodd’s sentence structure of an action followed by a consequence allows readers to understand that the aspen trees are, in fact, smart. The trees choose to get rid of their leaves in order to survive, just like humans make choices to avoid death. Dodd’s tone makes this fact seem logical, creating the impression that trees are also sentient and logical beings like humans. Hence, through her tone, Dodd allows readers to appreciate another side of the aspen trees and help readers realise that both humans and aspen trees have the same ultimate goal: survival.

                  Finally, Dodd constructs a soft and nurturing tone to mirror the nurturing characteristics of aspen trees. Dodd explains that the fallen leaves of the tress “nourish the forest in future years.” The word “nourish” gives the Aspen trees mother-like characteristics, creating the impression that the trees are nurturing and helpful to the rest of the forest.  Dodd constructs a soft tone from these types of words and phrases. Furthermore, Dodd writes how the fallen leaves “protect the roots of many other plants,” which again demonstrates how the aspen trees are nurturing and is evidence of Dodd’s soft and wholesome tone. Moreover, Dodd explains how animals in winter “eat the nutritious bark.”  Dodd’s use of the word “nutritious” conveys her use of a nurturing tone, delineating how aspen trees are selfless in that they are sustaining the forest either by providing food or protection for other organisms.

                  To conclude, Dodd employs both an emotive (admiring and soft) tone and factual (academic, scientific and logical) tone in order to aid readers in their own appreciation of the aspen trees. Throughout the article, Dodd’s tone allowed readers to understand the beauty of the trees and also connect with the trees on a scientific and personal level. At the beginning of the article, readers may not have understood Dodd’s fascination with these trees or indeed may have found it strange. However, after reading it, readers discover there is so much more to aspen trees than what meets the eye and next time they come across them, they should “stop and smell the aspen trees” to appreciate them as Dodd does.

Word count: 904

Teacher's Comments

Criterion A: Understanding and interpretation (5 marks)

  • To what extent does the student show an understanding of the text? What inferences can the student reasonably make?
  • To what extent does the student support their claims with references to the text?

4 out of 5: There is a good understanding of the text and the potential deeper implications.  It could have gone deeper, and an acknowledgement of context, audience, text type and/or purpose could have been more fully flushed out.  In other words, a fuller discussion of purpose, in relation to the question, would have elevated the response. 

Criterion B: Analysis and evaluation (5 marks)

  • How well does the student does the student evaluate the ways in which language and style establish meaning and effect?

4 out of 5: There is a hyper focused discussion of tone.  The candidate is good on defining and looking at tones within the text.   However, it does get repetitive at times and there is not enough unpacking of the evidence used to support the arguments made. 

Criterion C: Focus and organisation (5 marks)

  • How effectively does the student structure and present their ideas?
  • How balanced and focused is the response?

5 out of 5: It is effectively organized, if somewhat generic.  The conclusion draws ideas together well and the response is consistently focused on the question.

Criterion D: Language (5 marks)

  • How clear, varied, and accurate is the student’s language?
  • To what extent is the student’s choice of register, style, and terminology appropriate?

4 out of 5: The language is straightforward and somewhat generic, but is clear, coherent, and accurate throughout. Some more playful or precise word choice / sentence structures would push this a bit higher.