WT1 SL (Reviving Gaelic)
The following written task emerges from the Part 1 study of language death (and language revival). Described by its author as an ‘opinion article’, the task discusses the possible revival of Gaelic in an independent Scotland. Written tasks tend to be most successful when they are plausible, and that is certainly the case in this instance. Both the rationale and the task itself suggest genuine student engagement. Despite strong qualities, the task has a number of obvious weaknesses. As you read the task, try to identify both the virtues and the limitations of the task.
Sample Written Task
Teacher's Comments
Criterion A - Rationale - 2 marks
The rationale explains how the task is connected to the coursework.
2 out of 2 - Some of the language in the rationale is a little ambiguous. Nevertheless, there does seem to be a clear explanation of how the task relates to the course studied. The student goes on to describe how the topic and text type interconnect.
Criterion B - Task and Content - 8 marks
The content of a task should lend itself well to the type of text one chooses. The task should demonstrate an understanding of the coursework and topics studied. Finally, there should be evidence that the student has understood the conventions of writing a particular text type.
5 out of 8 -The task reveals a good understanding of the topic studied. For example, the student shows an awareness of the importance that language has for cultural identity, and this is made obvious through the clever analogy to the preservation of art. The student also discusses the perceived benefits of bilingualism whilst recognizing the way English is often perceived as a ‘language of opportunity’. And, the student also has some understanding of the interface between language and technology. However, in other regards, the task has a disarming naivety about it: It is simply implausible that the writer (Aofie Brody) has such a limited appreciation of Gaelic’s status in Scotland. Also, the student doesn’t explain how Scottish independence could precipitate Gaelic language revival. In terms of the text type, the task is a reasonable approximation of an opinionated article, and has an engaging personal voice.
Criterion C - Organization - 5 marks
The task is organized effectively and appropriately with a regard for the text type. There must be a sense of coherence.
3 out of 5 - The task begins confidently. The initial anecdote works well to hook the reader, establishing a personal connection to wider linguistic issues. At times, however, the movement of ideas is a little jarring. For example, in the penultimate paragraph, the sudden shift of focus from technology to language revival lacks logical coherence.
Criterion D - Language - 5 marks
The language of the task must be appropriate to the nature of the task. This means that students use an appropriate and effective register and style. Whatever the nature of the task, ideas must be communicated effectively.
4 out of 5 – The register is quite sound; there is a strong sense of a personal voice that is neither too formal, nor too colloquial. The language is varied and sometimes sophisticated. Breakdowns of idiom and punctuation are, however, quite obvious.