InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

2021 Paper 1: Sample Response 2 (Yoruba Twins)

 Reading task

This is the second model example from the May 2021 examination session focusing on the online BuzzFeed News article about twins.  You can find the first one here.  Titled "To Love Your Sister Is To Grieve Your Twin,” writer Tomi Obaro writes about her experience of being a twin while growing up caught between two cultures. 

The response below is a wonderful example to show students, especially as it concerns making argument about a text.  There are consistent claims about identity, culture, and being a twin.  There is also such convincing and insightful interpretation of text throughout.  The reading of the text is superb.  

It’s not perfect though and more could have been done in terms of references to the text and how meaning is created.  Still, there is no doubt that this student has excelled in this examination.

Finally, please remember that we cannot reprint the exam here.  You can buy the exam from the IB or get it from your IB Coordinator if they have a copy of it.  It's also important to note that the linked article was modified by the principal examiner.  The second paragraph has been edited down (as have other paragraphs that are on the longer end).  Paragraph breaks are added where breaks don't exist in the original text.  And some paragraphs have been cut out entirely.  In other words, it's impossible to describe the changes in perfect detail and we recommend buying the exam from the IB.

Sample Guided Textual Analysis

2021 Paper 1 Sample Response 2 (Yoruba Twins)

Guiding question: How is the narrative structure used to explore ideas about identity?

May 2021 Paper 1 Sample Response 2 (Yoruba Twins)

            The context of an author inevitably influences, whether unconsciously or subconsciously, the stylistic elements of a text.  In the case of this web article written in the style of a memoir, author Tomi Obaro’s experience as an immigrant from Nigeria to the UK and the United States shapes this text’s message about the loss of cultural identity due to Westernization in the twenty-first century.  Directed at an audience of primarily young, millennial readers from English speaking countries such as the US, this text, published under BuzzFeed News uses allusive imagery, repetition, and a circular structure to create a memoir that speaks not just on the difficulties connecting with a twin sibling, but also reflects on themes of growing up and struggling to find identity in the twenty-first century in a world that is undergoing rapid “Americanization.”

            Obaro uses a circular and chronological narrative structure to create a highly reflective memoir that also allows an unfamiliar reader to gain insight into the key events that have affected Obaro’s identity.  The article is written in the “historical tense,” which enables that author to detail her own perception of her identity at the different stages of her life.  In this memoir’s “Freytag’s Pyramid,” the first few paragraphs detailing the Yoruba culture serve as the exposition of Obaro’s life story.  The use of Yoruba words such as “Oluwadamilola,” alongside the introductory words of the article “My father prayed for twins” suggests to the readers that Obaro’s identity was initially connected to religion and tightly bound to her family; Obaro highlights to the millennial American reader how her twin and family defined her identity, and that this connection was believed to be irreplaceable.  The author uses this vivid description of tradition as the foundation for her story to magnify the contrast between the traditional idea of being a twin and her contemporary experience as one. 

            Furthermore, Obaro separates major life events into succinct and organized paragraphs that use repetition to highlight the idea that identity loss is a slow and almost insidious process.  The repetition of “First to go,” “Second to go,” and “Third to go” highlight the way in which Obaro and her sister slowly distanced themselves from their Nigerian culture, and how the loss of culture due to moving to the United States caused their own relationship to deteriorate.  This reminds the American reader of the exposition of this text, where the bond of the sisters was said to be inextricably linked to Yoruba culture.  This effect is amplified by Obaro’s variation of pronouns throughout the narrative structure: she originally writes with the pronoun “we,” but as the two sisters fall apart, she begins to write with the pronoun “I” when describing her career living as an adult in America.  Quite literally, Obaro writes as if she is a different person without her sister and her culture, which gives the American reader insight into how an immigrant or migrant face difficulties in holding an intersectional identity and often end up conforming to the identity held by those that surround them.

            The web-based article also features a distinct shift in tone which serves to highlight the change in personality that Obaro has undergone due to her detachment from her original Nigerian heritage.  Obaro starts writing in a personal, joyful tone describing her and her sister’s “cuteness” and comparing their physical features in an innocent and playful manner.  When Obaro reaches adulthood, focused on her career more than her family – as is the norm in an individualist, capitalist society such as America – she begins writing in a more removed, reserved tone highlighting to Western readers how the emphasis on individuality has, ironically, deprived her of her own cultural identity.  The atmosphere is further affected by the dialogue in the text, which is not present inside quotation marks but rather as if they are thoughts running through the mind of Obaro as she is reflecting on her past.  The geographical separation between the author and her sister serves as a metaphor for the emotional separation between them: Obaro allows the reader to understand how the author’s cultural identity slowly fell apart through a series of small changes while adjusting to American life.

            As a multi-modal web-based article, Obaro also makes use of powerful imagery, within the narrative structure, to highlight how identity, once thought of as irreplaceable, is incredibly fragile.  At the start of the memoir, the author presents an image of two historical sculptures representing the similarities and bond between twin sisters; this image is seen in a new perspective once the text is fully read – the image illustrates to the audience the contrast between the historical Yoruba connection between twins and the contemporary experience of having a twin in the twenty-first century’s Westernized and postcolonial world.  Although not explicitly criticized, the American reader gains insight into how Western culture has potentially erased and is perhaps even currently erasing cultures and therefore, the identity of people around the world, like Obaro and her twin sister.  The title of the memoir initially seems paradoxical, but its true meaning in unveiled clearly once the reader finishes this text’s circular structure and understands the theme of the problems with the erasing of one’s culture.

            In this article that reads like a memoir, immigrant-author Tomi Obaro writes about far more than the relationship between two siblings.  Aimed at Western readers of BuzzFeed News, the author describes the difficulty in maintaining cultural identity in the twenty-first century, varying her tone and using powerful imagery, to highlight how an intersectional identity is almost impossible to maintain.  Obaro uses repetition and metaphor to subtly convey to the reader how conforming can lead to the loss of one’s identity and culture, and therefore, the bond that ties people (and sisters) together.  The metaphor of a twin is a powerful symbol in describing how even those that are genetically identical have a relationship that is fragile and not inextricably linked to culture and heritage. 

Teacher's Comments

Criterion A: Understanding and interpretation (5 marks)

  • To what extent does the student show an understanding of the text? What inferences can the student reasonably make?
  • To what extent does the student support their claims with references to the text?

 5 out of 5: The claims and interpretations are so incredibly convincing, especially the arguments about identity.  Over and over again, in paragraph after paragraph, there is just such a high level of understanding about the text.  Yes, there could be more precision with the references, and this is a valid criticism, but looking at “best fit” marking, this belongs in the top band for the consistent and constant insights made.

Criterion B: Analysis and evaluation (5 marks)

  • How well does the student does the student evaluate the ways in which language and style establish meaning and effect?

 4 out of 5: While there is good understanding of the author’s choices, it’s not precise enough yet to get top marks.  It’s close, but there needs to be even more analysis of the narrative structure and there needs to be more analysis of the author’s choices after evidence is used. 

Criterion C: Focus and organisation (5 marks)

  • How effectively does the student structure and present their ideas?
  • How balanced and focused is the response?

 4 out of 5: This may seem like a harsh mark, as the introduction, body of the essay, and conclusion are well-organized.  That’s all true.  However, the focus on the guiding question isn’t always present as precisely as it could be and so top marks are not awarded here.  This may be a bit contentious, and one could justify a 5.  However, this mark acts as a reminder of the need to focus on the guiding question. 

Criterion D: Language (5 marks)

  • How clear, varied, and accurate is the student’s language?
  • To what extent is the student’s choice of register, style, and terminology appropriate?

 5 out of 5: It’s so persuasively written and the vocabulary is so strong that full marks are awarded in this criterion.  The student also writes sentences that are just convincing and precise.