InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

Language on Trial--A Further Oral Activity Script

When contemplating and planning for the Further Oral Activity, it is a good idea to refer back to the subject guide for guidance. While the guide is not always crystal clear, it will provide you with the basic framework and parameters you need in advance when figuring out how to tackle the Further Oral Activity.

The subject guide, on page 62, lists four headings or ways in which the FOA may be presented. They include structured group discussion, role play, dramatic presentation, and finally oral presentation.

The guide also states that “the further oral activity must be the work of the student and it may not be written out in full and read” (57). Several pages later, under dramatic presentation, the first example is “writing and performing a scene” (62).

These seem to directly contradict each other. How can a student write and perform a scene without writing out the scene in full?

And this is where your best judgment arises. No one wants to sit through a presentation in which a student reads from a script. It’s painful for everyone involved. Yet, some of the types of Further Oral Activities suggested necessitate a script being written beforehand (as evidenced in the dramatic presentation examples).

That does not mean students can or should bring in a script though when actually presenting. It would be akin to watching a play in which the actors have the lines in their hands as they are performing. Instead, in certain cases, it is just a tool to help shape the Further Oral Activity.

The advice one student gives other students is this: "We used it (the script) for us to know our main points. We elaborated on them in the actual FOA. This was just the base." His example is below. If used correctly, as a way to help students frame their thinking, a script can be helpful before - not during - the actual Further Oral Activity.

Contextual Information

As part of the study of Part 1: Language in a Cultural Context, students explored “the ways in which language affirms identity” (Subject Guide, 18). They wrote personal narratives to consolidate their understanding of the subject material studied in class. They then used those written pieces as the basis to create their Further Oral Activity. They put language on trial, setting up the classroom as a courtroom and asked the question “does language constrain our identity?” The class acted as the jury.

Further Oral Activity Assessment Criteria

Student Example

Teacher Comments

It's important to remember that these comments are based on the actual FOA and not on the script itself. Although students created a script, they did not use it when delivering their assessment. It's also important to remember that each individual student receives a separate mark; they are not graded together.

Criterion A: Knowledge and understanding of the text(s) and subject matter or extract

To what extent does the activity show knowledge and understanding of the text(s) and subject chosen for the oral activity?

Has the student shown awareness and understanding of the meaning of the text(s) in relation to the subject?

10 out of 10 The student demonstrated excellent knowledge about language, identity, and how the two interact. This was most evident in the larger arguments he made as the prosecutor. These framed the debate (the trial) and showed he understood not only the texts, but the larger ideas behind them.

Criterion B: Understanding of how language is used

To what extent does the activity show understanding of the way language is used to create meaning?

Has the student shown an appreciation of how language and style is used to particular effect in the text?

9 out of 10 The student was very strong in this area. Literary devices and features were not only mentioned or named. More importantly, he showed the effect they had on the audience in relation to his argument. In other words, he showed an excellent understanding of how language is used to create meaning. He could have unpacked his quotations though a bit more, and that is why he did not receive top marks.

Criterion C: Organization

How well organized is the commentary?

How coherent is the structure?

5 out of 5 The student put together a very strong argument because it was so well structured within the context of a court case. It followed the back and forth that would be seen in an actual courtroom.

Criterion D: Language

How clear, varied and accurate is the language?

How appropriate is the choice of register and style? (“Register” refers, in this context, to the student’s use of elements such as vocabulary, tone, sentence structure and idiom appropriate to the further oral activity.)

5 out of 5 The student used the style and register of a prosecutor. This was vital in his presentation as it all depended on striking the right tone and register. This was fully accomplished.