InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

2014 Paper 1 (HL) Fatherhood (Part 2)

The following exemplar is a student response to the May 2014 Higher Level Paper 1 examination.  It compliments an earlier post about these texts with the goal of providing a range of student writing on the site.  A third exemplar will be published soon, allowing you and your students a wide variety of samples from the same exam.  While not a perfect response, this exemplar is excellent.  The scoring is explained below.

This comparative commentary is a response to Section 2.  Text C is titled “My girls and me” and Text D is from the National Fatherhood Initiative with fatherhood acting as the main thread that connects them together. 

You might choose to use this exemplar in class, discussing and grading it together with your students.  You may have students look at the moves the writer makes in the commentary and then have your students try to emulate such moves.  You might just give it to them to read for revision.  In other words, use this exemplar to fit your needs and the needs of your students.  It is always helpful to have the grading criteria during this process too.

Sample Response

Sample Student Response

May 2014 Paper 1 Example

It is said that being a parent is the toughest job in the world, so it is no surprise that it is a topic that often crops up in the media.  Two texts, an article from the UK newspaper “The Guardian” and an online blog post from the National Fatherhood Initiative touch on the difficulties of being a father, especially when it comes to daughters.  Whilst “The Guardian’s” ultimate aim is to attract readers and entertain them, the National Fatherhood Initiative hopes to help fathers do well in raising their children.  The portrayal of strained father-daughter relationships in both texts acts as a warning for their respective audiences.

The relationship between fathers and daughters in both texts are extremely similar, despite differences in their situations.  The texts convey a father estranged from their daughter(s), and this is done through the idea of money.  The NFI’s website uses money as a metaphor for the effort put into the relationship by the father, but has a similar effect to Text C.  The word choice portrays the father as irresponsible and makes it seems as though he lacks knowledge of the situation.  The phrases he uses throughout, such as “I don’t remember,” “I guess, “ “stuff like that,” and “can’t I just” highlight this.  In response, the daughter (who is playing the role of the bank teller of her heart) responds in an extremely dry, unemotional tone due to the fact that the father has not made an effort in their relationship. 

“The Guardian” article focuses on a local billionaire who has reached celebrity status and paints the patriarch, Bernie Ecclestone, as well meaning, but overall makes his parenting methods appear questionable.  The casual mention of absurd multi-million dollar homes and weddings is perhaps the best indicator of the sheer wealth the Ecclestones possess, even more so when the ridiculousness of these prices are described as an afterthought in parentheses as “a typical Bernie deal.”  The result of him spoiling his daughters is reflected in the choice in diction used to describe Bernie’s demeanor and Bernie’s description of his daughters: Bernie “frowns,” says things with “an air of mild exasperation” and “a despairing sigh.”  He is “ignored” and his daughters’ spending habits are “unnecessary. Completely unnecessary.”  This is obviously not the ideal relationship between a father and his daughters.  The focus of the text is highlighted by the accompanying image on the top right, next to the title where Bernie sits morosely, leaning his head on his hand looking down.  He appears passive and a bit upset.  Interestingly, the placement of his daughter’s image makes it so that they are in what would be his line of sight, giving the text the appearance that Bernie’s look is aimed at his daughters, implying that he has given up on them.  The relationships shown in both texts are situations that all fathers hope to avoid, and serve as a warning for spoiling or not paying enough attention to your children.

However, these situations are filtered through the opinions of the newspaper, and the situation of the NFI’s post on their website is entirely fictional.  “The Guardian” is a newspaper known for titles meant to draw readers and columnists are often vocal about their personal opinions.  Richard Williams uses a slightly snarky tone commenting on the Ecclestones, adding “(oh dear)” following the mention of Tamara Ecclestone’s reality television show and sarcastically states that Bernie’s comments on money are in fact describing “the art of spending money wisely.”  This is followed later on in the article with him questioning Bernie’s statements regarding his daughters – “Hang on a minute.”  Williams pauses the conversation before making a jab at Tamara Ecclestone for owning “200 Hermes handbags” and suggesting she is too lazy to make “a three-point turn in her Ferrari.”  The mention of expensive luxury brands highlights their wealth and contrasts the earlier idea of “spending money wisely.”

While we see that the Ecclestone Family essentially spends too much money, the father on the NFI website is not spending enough, although the money is metaphorical.  The title reflects this, and grabs the attention of potential readers by asking “Are You Trying to Rob Your Kids?”  The focus on the situation at hand in the title, as opposed to the vague and uninformative “My girls and me” makes clear the purpose of the website.  It also clearly establishes the audience by referring to the parents as “you.”  The “NFI Mission & Strategy” is clearly displayed above the headline, with its title fully capitalized in bold letters to stand out.  This website wastes no time in making its intentions clear – helping by “equipping and educating fathers” to be “involved, responsible and committed.”  The legitimacy of the website is aided by the banner above.  It appears professional, with a logo, showing an adult holding a child’s hand, a title with a registered symbol, and links stating, “donate,” “get involved,” “about,” “statistics,” and “subscribe.”  The increased legitimacy of the website makes it so that the readers will trust what the website is saying and take note of its warnings.  They will be more likely to trust the warnings and take action if they see the source as a knowledgeable authoritative figure. 

The end result of these texts is that the father lacks control due to the lack of a healthy relationship with their daughters.  The National Fatherhood Initiative’s fictional situation ends quite dramatically with the daughter accusing the father of trying to rob the “bank of her heart” and asking him to leave or else be escorted out by security.  Bernie Ecclestone’s lack of control shows through his lack of control of the money his daughter’s have access to.  His plans for them and their spending of the trust fund he had set out for them simply “Didn’t happen.”  As a father, most people will want to have some semblance of control over their family and be able to have a say in their children’s lives – especially when the children have the spending habits of Petra and Tamara Ecclestone.  This less than ideal scenario can motivate fathers to avoid this by scaring them, as they do not want to be in this scenario themselves.

The warnings provided by both texts, intentional of not, will be able to help father to avoid the same mistakes made by Bernie Ecclestone and the fictional father created by the NFI.  Healthy human relationships are ideal for all, and “The Guardian” and the NFI provide a stepping stone to achieve this by explicitly showing what not to do as a father. 

Teacher's Comments

Criterion A - Understanding and comparison of the texts - 5 marks

The analysis should show and understanding of the similarities and differences between the texts. There needs to be a clear understanding of the target audience, the purpose and the context (where possible) of the text. The comparative analysis must be supported by relevant examples from the texts.

4 out of 5:  While the candidate understands each text (the audience, purpose, context...) to a good extent, it is not subtle enough to award higher.  Even more comparative work is also needed.  There is more than enough discussed in the commentary and more than enough compared to award a 4 though. 

Criterion B - Understanding of the use and effects of stylistic features - 5 marks

The comparative analysis should show an understanding of how various stylistic features, such as tone, style and structure, are used to construct meaning. The analysis should comment on the effects that these features have on their target audience.

4 out of 5: There is a good and detailed understanding of the effects of the various stylistic features on the reader.  The comments about the images are particularly insightful.  However, there could be even more close analysis of the language used throughout each text.     

Criterion C - Organization and development - 5 marks

The analysis must be well-balanced, meaning that it treats both texts equally. Furthermore, it must be well-structured, coherent and organized.

5 out of 5: This is a well-balanced comparative commentary.  The argument is logically constructed and it is clearly organized, developing points thoughtfully. 

Criterion D - Language - 5 marks

The language of the comparative analysis must be clear and accurate. It should be appropriate, meaning it contains formal sentence structure, good choice of words and effective terminology.

5 out of 5: While not the most verbose or eloquent of commentaries, the candidate is clear, accurate, and effective; it receives top marks because of that.