2020 EE Category 2 (The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle and We Have Always Lived in the Castle)
While it might look like a cute picture of cats was used as clickbait, this isn't the case. This post really is about cats!
For this student's Category 2 Extended Essay, she explored the role of cats in two novels she had read independently, outside of the course. Because Category 2 EEs require students to analyze two literary works, one in translation and one originally written in English, the candidate had to compare and contrast them. Working with The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle by Haruki Murakami and We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson, the student found themselves interested in the cats that kept appearing. She kept thinking about them and thinking about why the authors included them? That thinking lead to this Extended Essay.
It is not a top scoring EE (it scores a low B at 22 total points). Instead, it is a good example of a student taking a topic that interests them while also learning about how to research and incorporate research into an longer piece of academic writing.
Finally, please note that the reflection form itself cannot be uploaded. Instead, it has been copied/pasted and altered as necessary without changing the content of the reflection. Also note that the cover page (page 1) of this EE states this is a C1 EE. That is wrong. This student did not carefully proofread and just took a model example cover page without making the necessary changes to her own!
Sample Essay
C2 EE The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle and We Have Always Lived in the Castle
N.B. Available as a pdf file only
Teacher's Comments
Criterion A: Focus and method - 6 marks
This criterion focuses on the topic, the research question and the methodology. It assesses the explanation of the focus of the research (this includes the topic and the research question), how the research will be undertaken, and how the focus is maintained throughout the essay.
4 out of 6: This receives 4 out of 6 mainly for the methodology of the research. It's fine (mostly complete). But there's more that could have been done in this area to demonstrate an understanding of what was used and why.
Criterion B: Knowledge and understanding - 6 marks
This criterion assesses the extent to which the research relates to the subject area/discipline used to explore the research question, or in the case of the world studies extended essay, the issue addressed and the two disciplinary perspectives applied, and additionally the way in which this knowledge and understanding is demonstrated through the use of appropriate terminology and concepts.
4 out of 6: The knowledge and understanding of each novel is good. It's beyond "limited," but isn't yet "excellent."
Criterion C: Critical thinking - 12 marks
This criterion assesses the extent to which critical-thinking skills have been used to analyze and evaluate the research undertaken.
6 out of 12: The research, analysis, and discussion are all adequate, but on the higher end of the band. The analysis of the cats and how secondary or minor characters function is shown throughout the essay, but it's not yet fully at the "good" stage.
Criterion D: Presentation - 4 marks
This criterion assesses the extent to which the presentation follows the standard format expected for academic writing and the extent to which this aids effective communication.
4 out of 4: The presentation is good. Effective use of MLA citation is found throughout. It's done properly.
Criterion E: Engagement - 6 marks
This criterion assesses the student’s engagement with their research focus and the research process. It will be applied by the examiner at the end of the assessment of the essay, after considering the student’s Reflection on planning and progress form.
4 out of 6: There is a good level of engagement, but not enough critical reflection occurs to bring it up into the 5-6 band.
Reflection on planning and progress
Reflection Sessions 1-3
First Reflection Session:
My question of what the role of cats are in The Windup Bird Chronicle by Haruki Murakami and We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson interested me because I knew that Murakami often uses cats as gateways to deeper meanings and I wanted to know if that’d be consistent in another cat character. I found that both cats serve as a gateway to explaining the unknowns of the plot, being the main characters internal thoughts in Jackson’s novel and the conflict in Murakami’s novel. My process is to gather and sort all the relevant information given and link them into claims; what's challenging about this process is that it’s hard to gauge what’s excess information and what’s repetitive. It’s worth investigating because authors choice of characters and details each serve a purpose, however minor; therefore to fully understand the plot each minor character is worth investigating.
Second Reflection Session:
While writing my first draft, I learned a lot about myself as a writer. I learned in order for me to write well, I need to know my content well. Thoroughly knowing my content improves the clarity of my writing; if I know what I want to say, I just need to focus on how I want to say things. I realised this when I was overwhelmed by the amount of content and insight I found; there were a lot of options for the focus of my interpretation of the text. I had difficulty accepting that I couldn’t use all the information I gathered and realised I needed to be selective. This was difficult since I was unclear about my argument, making it hard to be selective on what I should use to support my argument and shouldn’t. I realised I needed to know my arguments and claims before I work with the evidence to support me. I’m concerned about my use of research and whether it’s redundant. Additionally, I’m concerned about my long sentences and know I need to cut wordy sentences; the best way for me to resolve this is by reading the whole thing through thoroughly.
Third and Final Reflection Session:
my final product. Corrections since my first draft have been challenging, as I had to balance between expanding - on secondary sources to improve my claims and credibility - and cutting my word count. I struggled with being selective with my overwhelming evidence. I realised my attachment to interesting pieces of evidence was interfering with the clarity of my claims, and choosing a few clear examples instead, strengthens my claims. Overall, I learned throughout this process that the most important step for my success as a writer is to solidify my understanding of the sources. This makes forming claims, identifying authors’ intentions and writing clearly and concisely, easier. Knowing this will help motivate me to invest in essay research in university and helped me better understand myself as a writer.
Word count: 478