InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

WT2 Q3 (Starkey)

The following written task 2 took its inspiration from a unit on race and language. Students were given all six prescribed questions for written task 2 and shown a few videos, one of which was this interview with David Starkey on Newsnight, a BBC program. Students were asked to select one of the six questions that could be answered effectively, using one of the texts or videos that they had seen. One student found the third prescribed question particularly relevant to the David Starkey interview. 

"How and why is a social group represented in a particular way."

In brief, the essay focuses on Starkey's depiction of black people as the cause of the riots in London in 2011. The interview lends itself well to the question and critical writing in general, because it is so contentious. It proves the point that controversial texts tend to instigate discussion and spark good ideas in the classroom.

Before you assess this student's work, we recommend reading the assessment criteria carefully. Before reading the examiner's comments below, ask yourself what you would give the critical response. Support your marks with arguments. 

Primary source

 David Starkey on Newsnight
BBC
15 August 2011

  

Sample critical response

 Sample written task 2 Question 3 (Starkey)

Outline

Prescribed question:How and why is a social group represented in a particular way?

Title of the text for analysis:  David Starkey on Newsnight, BBC

Part of the course to which the task refers:Part 2 – Language and mass communication

My critical response will:

  • Introduce the David Starkey interview on Newsnight and put it into the context of the London riots from 2011.
  • Show how David Starkey equates violence and nihilism to ‘black culture’, which in effect offends black people and inadvertently accuses them of the riots.
  • Point out that David Starkey uses very selective arguments in proving his point that the ‘whites have become black’.
  • Expand on Starkey’s allusion to Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech from 1964.
  • Conclude by stating Starkey’s use of language has led to his downfall and the accusations that he is a racist.  

Written task 2

Amidst the aftermath of the 2011 riots in the United Kingdom, politicians pointed their fingers nervously to different factors that could have sparked the riots. David Starkey, a famous British historian, went on BBC’s Newsnight in August 2011 and put the blame squarely on the lap of the black community. In this interview, which will be analyzed here, David Starkey depicts black people synonymously with violence and destruction through biased language, sweeping generalizations and allusion.

First of all, David Starkey speaks about black culture in a very disapproving manner through his use of epithet. He uses many terms synonymously with black culture. Early in the interview he lists several abstract nouns, saying the riots were caused by “a particular sort of violent, destructive, nihilistic gangster culture” which speaks the language of “patois” and listens to “rap music.” When asked to further expand on his understanding of rap music, and whether rap music is to be blamed for the riots, David Starkey responds by saying that “it certainly glorifies violence.” By constantly referring to ‘black culture’ as “violent, destructive and nihilistic,” he is inadvertently depicting black people as the root of the problems that caused the London riots of 2011.

Secondly he his very selective in the evidence that he uses to support his arguments. He refers to TV host David Lammy as an “archetypical, successful black man” who speaks with a white accent, thereby equating white English with success and sophistication. Once again ‘white’ is equated to ‘good’ and ‘black’ is equated to ‘bad’. Even though another guest, Owen James, tells Starkey that he is making a false analogy, Starkey continues with his selective arguments. During the interview, Starkey turns to another guest, Dreda Say Mitchell, who is black, and says “you don’t talk like them either.” She is offended and reminds David that rap music and the Patois language are very rich in culture and that he should not speak about a ‘them and us’ paradigm. Doing so, she argues, leads to a divided country that riots and loots even more. Again Starkey does not listen and continues to list examples of white people acting ‘black’ disgracefully, referring to the Olympic flag bearer for the UK, whom he quotes using slang as she was caught looting on TV. He refuses to see Dreda Say Mitchell’s point because he has come with such selective arguments to prove his own point, that black ‘culture’ is the root of the problem. Unfortunately, every time he refers to ‘black culture’ he is offending and black viewers as well.

Finally, David Starkey commits himself even more to this extreme position through multiple allusions to Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech from 1964. It helps to have a contextual understanding of this speech, in order to understand the position of David Starkey. Enoch Powell warned that England would fall like the Roman Empire through an enemy that attacked from within, saying that London, like the river Tiber (which runs through Rome), would foam with blood. Powell was an MP who spoke out against immigration policies in the UK, predicting that immigrants would destroy British culture and tear down society from within. David Starkey quotes Powell early in the interview and continues to refer to it. Starkey believes Powell’s prediction has come true; London is collapsing like the Roman Empire. Starkey points out though that Powell was wrong in his prediction that the “black man would have the whip over the white man.” Instead, as Starkey so famously states, “the whites have become blacks”. Again, Starkey has equated black people with the problems that caused the riots in the summer of 2011. This time he does it by alluding to the Rivers of Blood speech, which is just as contentious today as it was then.

While the riot was racially charged indeed (a white police officer shot a black man and refused to answer the family’s request for clarification), ‘black culture’ in general cannot be blamed. By doing so, David Starkey inadvertently blames black people, causing a greater polarization of communities and potential for violence. In this interview on Newsnight, Starkey’s use of labels, generalization and allusion all depict black people as the root of the problem that caused the riots in 2011. As a result David Starkey has most likely ended his career as a well-respected author and speaker. Understandably, many reactions to this interview have accused David Starkey of being a racist.

Works cited

"David Starkey Tries to Talk about the English Riots on Newsnight - YouTube."YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Web. 21 Dec. 2011. .

Updated:, Toby Young Society Last. "Was David Starkey Being Racist on Newsnight Last Night? – Telegraph Blogs." Telegraph Blogs. Web. 22 Dec. 2011. .

Examiner's comments

Criterion A - Outline - 2 marks

The outline clearly states the focus of the task.

2 out of 2 - The outline clearly states the focus of the task. The bulet-pointed overview takes a paragraph by paragraph approach in its explanation of how the student will tackle the task, focusing first on generalizations, selective arguments and then allusion, as linguistic devices that achieve a certain effect on the audience.

Criterion B - Response to question - 8 marks

Student explores all of the implications of the prescribed question chosen. The critical response must be focused on and relevant to the prescribed question. Furthermore, the response is supported by well chosen examples from the text(s).

6 out of 8 - The task explores both aspects of the question: the 'how' and the 'why'. In answering the first part, the student explores Starkey's use of language well. Allusion, epithet and generalizations are all excellent terms to apply to this interview. The examples of these are relevant and well chosen as well. In answering the second part of the question ('why' blacks are depicted a certain way), the student comes up somewhat short. Every paragraph returns to the idea that the blacks are being blamed for the riots. This is the 'why'. Nevertheless, this could have been explored with more depth. 

Criterion C - Organization and argument - 5 marks

The response must be well organized and effectively structured in order to score top marks for this criterion. The response should make a case and develop it thoroghly.

3 out of 5 - the essay is well-organized and effectively structured. However it fails to achieve the minimum word count of 800, and so two marks have been deducted here accordingly. The use of topic sentences is effective and each paragraph is coherent, following the PIE structure (point, illustrate, explain).

Criterion D - Language and style - 5 marks

The response must be written effectively and accurately. Students should use an academic register and strong style.

5 out of 5 - The language is very appropriate to the task. The style of the essay is clear and concise.