InThinking Revision Sites

INTHINKING REVISION SITES

Own your learning

Why not also try our independent learning self-study & revision websites for students?

We currenly offer the following DP Sites: Biology, Chemistry, English A Lang & Lit, Maths A&A, Maths A&I, Physics, Spanish B

"The site is great for revising the basic understandings of each topic quickly. Especially since you are able to test yourself at the end of each page and easily see where yo need to improve."

"It is life saving... I am passing IB because of this site!"

Basic (limited access) subscriptions are FREE. Check them out at:

WT2 Q5 (ACLU)

The following written task 2 took its inspiration from a lesson on racial profiling, in which students studied various text types. One of the texts was a public service announcement from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The comparative discussion inadvertently answered one of the prescribed questions for written task 2:

How does the text conform to, or deviate from, the conventions of a particular genre, and for what purpose?

The sample examines how the primary source makes use of the structural conventions for wanted posters, public service announcements and print advertising. It explores how the text both adheres to and breaks convention.

Remember: Creating a mind map or spider diagram around the prescribed question will help you on Criterion B. You will notice that this sample essay does not answer the second half of this question, "and for what purpose?" The student would have focused more on purpose, if he had brainstormed more on the implications of the question.

Primary source

The Man on the Left
ACLU
2005

Sample critical response

 Sample written task 2 Question 5 (ACLU)

Outline

Prescribed question:“How does the text conform to, or deviate from, the conventions of a particular genre, and for what purpose?”

Title of text for analysis:The Man on the Left

Part of the course to which the task refers: Part 2 – Language and mass communication

My critical response will:

  • Explain how the ad breaks the conventions of advertising by using the form of a wanted poster.
  • Explain the effects of using the wanted poster and the images of Charles Manson and Martin Luther King on its audience.
  • Show how the ad uses other devices, such as juxtaposition and celebrities to meet its aim of convincing Americans to care more about racial profiling.

Written task 2

“The man on the left is 75 times more likely to be stopped by the police while driving than the man on the right”, says the headline on ACLU’s new poster featuring the famous human rights activist, Martin Luther King Jr. on the left. On the right, the famous American criminal, Charles Manson is portrayed. This public service announcement looks more like a wanted poster than a conventional advertisement. The creators of the ad deviated from, and conformed to the conventions of advertising in various ways in order to attract more attention to this announcement that promotes racial equality.

Starting from what is obvious, the ad, with its bold headline, pictures in the middle, and details in small letters under them, looks like a wanted poster, instead of a regular ad. Wanted posters were used in the Wild West to attract public attention to a notorious villain, and therefore are considered a sign of danger. They are very quickly spotted and in that way are capable of sending a quick message very effectively. Hence, they are a good basis for a public service announcement. Another way this announcement deviates from the genre is that there’s no product name, or signature anywhere. In advertising, repeating the product name, having a small picture of the product, called a signature, in the bottom, and having a good catchphrase is part of ‘branding’, and it is used to persuade people into associating the product/service/idea with certain desired qualities. In this case, the name of the brand is much less important than the idea trying to be conveyed, so this ad only features the name of the organization that created this ad in small letters on the bottom of the page.

Although this ad doesn’t strictly follow the conventions of advertising, it features some of the traits carried by conventional advertisements. Just as advertisements have big pictures of the product, and a headline, the two large pictures of Martin Luther King and Charles Manson, and the big, bolded headline are letting the public know that we all must stop racial biasing in order to make this world a more just place. This was apparently a very serious matter in the United States at the time this ad came out. Executive Director of the ACLU – Ira Glasser, said that "Racial bias is a persistent and pernicious threat to democracy in this country, and nowhere is that more evident than in the retirement of people of color by law enforcement and the criminal justice system.”

The use of celebrities is also crucial to the message conveyed, because the main logic mechanism behind the poster is Marin Luther’s and Charles Manson’s skin colors versus deeds. Putting these two characters, one good, one bad, together, demonstrates juxtaposition, which helps the message be really potential. The most important thing this ad shares with other good ads is that it is unusual. In order to be effective, any form of media has to inspire certain feelings within an individual, like happiness, sadness, guilt, envy, etc. In this case, the author toys with the beholders emotions by inspiring collective guilt. Unusual ads are most of the time more complex than normal ones, and they can create a lot of different reactions and some even create controversy, which is also used as a tool to gain publicity. This makes people talk about the ads, extending the message from poster to word of mouth advertising. If an ad is too explicit or offending to someone, it will almost certainly get banned. However, it will still stir up commotion, and this gets its maker a lot of publicity.  Unusual ads also physically attract more attention to themselves than normal ads, possibly because they create distortion in the atmosphere of where they are placed. With this advertisement being a poster, some of the characteristic things in advertising related to audio and video, like certain visual effects we get in television commercials or using a popular song to sell your product could not have been used.

The creators of this ad deviated from the conventions of advertising in aspects that they didn’t need to cover in their case, like not having a catchy phrase to remember, or a fancy, reoccurring product name and label. They did, however conform to those same conventions in other aspects, like having an unusual ad that creates commotion, having a headline, featuring two easily recognizable faces, and finally, using stylistic devices, like juxtaposition. Through this combination, the creators were able to effectively convey their message – we must stop profiling people based on their skin color.

Works cited

ACLU Attacks Racial Profiling With Ad Citing Dr. King And Charles Manson”, June 26th, 2000 Issue of Jet Magazine

Examiner's comments

Criterion A - Outline - 2 marks

The outline clearly states the focus of the task.

2 out of 2 - The outline is clear. It states the focus of the task, even though the task does not actually comment on racial profiling much.

Criterion B - Response to question - 8 marks

Student explores all of the implications of the prescribed question chosen. The critical response must be focused on and relevant to the prescribed question. Furthermore, the response is supported by well chosen examples from the text(s).

4 out of 8 - While the candidate does a good job exploring the first half of the question ('how' does it adhere to and break conventions), it hardly touches on the second half of the question ('why' does it adhere to and break conventions). In the thesis statement the student refers to the text's purpose as promoting 'racial equality'. However, the text is really more about the phenomenon of racial profiling. Comments on the use of image, juxtaposition, the Wild West poster and shock advertising. 

Criterion C - Organization and argument - 5 marks

The response must be well organized and effectively structured in order to score top marks for this criterion. The response should make a case and develop it thoroughly.

3 out of 5 - There is evidence of structure. The student begins with a paragraph on how the text breaks structural conventions. Then he writes on how the text adheres to conventions. However the purpose of the third paragraph is not very clear. The quality of the essay seems to deteriorate as one continues. The one quotation from a secondary source is not explained. Its relevance to racial profiling and this ad in specific is not clear.

Criterion D - Language and style - 5 marks

The response must be written effectively and accurately. Students should use an academic register and strong style.

3 out of 5 - The student makes a few errors. First of all, the tone is rather colloquial through its use of contractions ("don't" and "there's") and presumptuous phrases ("starting with what is obvious"). Secondly, several sentences should have been reviewed for their lack of clarity, such as the sentence, "With this advertisement being a poster, some of the characteristic things in advertising related to audio and video, like certain visual effects we get in television commercials or using a popular song to sell your product could not have been used."