2014 Paper 1 (HL) Fatherhood (Part 3)
/post-28/baby-1150109_640.jpg)
The third in a series of posts, this exemplar falls right in between the two earlier comparative commentaries. The excellent exemplar, posted here, will help students understand the sophisticated thinking and the analytical writing required to obtain high marks. It is not perfect, but it is a good example of what a candidate needs to do to just eek out a 7. On the lower end, found here, students can see what happens when a commentary falls flat. The truth is, most of the students we teach fall somewhere in between. This comparative commentary is the bridge between the two.
Perhaps you photocopy all three exemplars for your students. As a revision task, they read them and put them in order from top to bottom. A discussion about why that is the case, using the criteria, ensues. If you find working with all three at one time too much, pick two. Show students how to move from more narration and limited analysis of a writer’s choices – the lower end exemplar – to adding more interpretation of what a writer does and why using the mid-range exemplar. Maybe your students are struggling to get to that top end. Compare and contrast the mid and the high exemplar, talking about what specifically makes them different and what they can do to improve.
Just a reminder that this is a response to the May 2014 Higher Level Paper 1 examination about fatherhood and that we cannot publish the examination paper because of copyright laws.
Sample Response
Paper 1 Exemplar
The two texts are united under a common theme of father-daughter relationships and the issue of the father’s role and responsibilities in the upbringing of a child. Text C is an article adapted from the newspaper “The Guardian” written on Saturday 10th December 2011. The audience of this text can range from British people who read the newspaper daily to any other parents, specifically fathers, or adults who are about to become fathers. Since “The Guardian” is also an online newspaper company, online users around the world may come across this text as well. Text D is a text from a website called the National Fatherhood Initiative in 2011, the same year as text C. Being an online article, Text D is multi-modal in nature and targets people around the globe, as well as other people who may encounter this website unintentionally. By the context of the article, this website seems to be based in America, and hence may have an American contexts and audience, as well as other parents, and again, especially fathers. Both texts engage their readers with their respective text type, visuals, and dictions to get their purpose or raising awareness across.
Firstly, the two texts seem to share many similarities. Both texts aim to raise awareness of child education and they do this through their respective means. Text C reveals a personal experience about “a generous billionaire father,” Bernie Ecclestone speaking candidly about his “daughter Tamara’s TV show and daughter Petra’s wedding.” The text points out that the two daughters spend money on “completely unnecessary” objects such as “shows and bloody clothes.” Ecclestone also states that his wife has control over the money, but the “idea was that the daughters would buy property that would be long term,” not the way the daughters are spending now. This implies that perhaps there was a mistake in Eccestone’s method of nurture, and shouldn’t have spoiled the daughters providing them with financial security. Text D is similar to text C “to improve the well-being of children” and educate the fathers. Through a short anecdotal account about the “deposits” in the father-daughter “bank accounts,” Text D also implies the lack of deposits from the father was perhaps the mistake and an important feature for a healthy relationship. Hence, the two texts share similarities in the theme and purpose.
In contrast, although the central ideas of the two texts are similar, the two texts utilize differing text type and structure to convey the expected role of an ideal father. Text C – being an article – has some formality in its structure and layout. The text is arranged in two sections, with the starting headline at the top and supporting details at the bottom written in three columns. The headline “My girls and me” is big and bold capturing the readers’ attentions. Text D also cleverly structures the website logo and title at the top with a box boarder, and the text is organized into sub-sections. Although not as big and catchy as Text C, the sub-headings of Text D are in capitals and bolded to appeal to the readers, such as “NFI MISSION & STRATEGY.” One major difference as a result of different text type is the use of hyperlinks in Text D. At the top right hand corner, there is a list of hyperlinks that the readers can explore further ranging from “donate,” “about” for information and “get involved” and “subscribe” for more interaction.
Moreover, Text D also uses tags at the end of the text, which is a typical feature of an online article, and allows for further exploration for the readers. Interestingly, Text C has more emphasis visuals compared to Text D, and uses two relatively big photos. Both are black and white, but it is enough to capture the details. In fact, being a black and white photograph, the simplicity captures the audiences more. One photograph is of the father in a simple white shirt with glasses and white hair, in a plain background, while the other photograph of the two daughters is in contrast with the daughter’s wearing fancy and luxurious dresses, with fully done hair and make up, as well as the presence of expensive purses and jewelry. The white hair and glasses on the father may suggest the amount of stress and hardships the father experienced in his billionaire career and perhaps his irritation for lack of control over the money. The photograph of the daughters goes hand in hand with the text and acts as a visual representation of the attitudes of the daughters. Though to a lesser extent and much smaller in size, Text D also uses a small illustration at the top left hand corner next to the name of the website. The photograph seems to indicate two hands, the father’s and the child’s, held together, but the lack of firmness in the hands may imply a lack of a strong relationship between the two, which links to the purpose of the text of the potential harm in neglecting your daughter. With differing text types, structure, and layout, the two texts still portray their respective purposes.
Lastly, the use of diction and dialogue is clearly distinct in the two texts. Text C contains prose that is highly informative and conversational in time. The paragraphs are relatively short, with short syntax of sometimes two works for a sentence such as “Didn’t happen” or “Completely unnecessary.” There is also a use of repetition in the quotations by Ecclestone saying “I’m a…I’m rich…I’m rich” in the form of listing. The text as a whole utilizes a format of questions and answers, where hypophora is used, with a question and immediate reply. Text D on the other hand is an illustration of a scene and hence is structured in a dialogue format. Similar to Text C, the tone is very conversational and informal with short syntax and lexis. The difference will be that Text D does not sue any paragraphs in the anecdotal scene, and very short paragraphs are used prior to the scene. In the short paragraphs above, there is the use of synthetic personalization of “you” having the effect of directly addressing the readers and adding a personal connection. Furthermore, the tone of the daughter starts more polite, and gradually changes to a more threatening tone. “Or, do I need to call security” highlights the risks and dangers of the relationship between father and child if there is a lack of “deposits” from the father to the “15 year-old daughter’s heart.” The lack of authority of the father is depicted through the declarative voice of the daughter, who is the person in charge while the father pleads for a withdrawal that is not possible. Thus, the National Fatherhood Initiative website uses pathos to provoke fathers of the potential consequences of the breakdown of relationships and united fathers for a “brighter future.” In both texts, diction, dialogue, and voice plays a fundamental role in raising awareness of the issue of the roles and responsibilities of the father in the household.
As a whole, the two texts portray the common problems facing many households in the current society. Perhaps the secondary purpose of both texts is to highlight the tiring role of a father to take charge of both financial and emotional matters in the nurturing of a child, rather than the sole purpose to raise awareness and encourage fathers to be more engaging. As Text C shows, if the family has abundant money, the daughters satisfy themselves with materialistic wants, but it is not the father’s intention and is an undesired outcome. Likewise, in Text D, if there is a lack of “deposits,” or emotional engagement, the relationship also often struggles. Finding the balance is indeed difficult, and the two texts perhaps depict the burden of the fathers of the world.
Teacher's Comments
Criterion A - Understanding and comparison of the texts - 5 marks
The analysis should show and understanding of the similarities and differences between the texts. There needs to be a clear understanding of the target audience, the purpose and the context (where possible) of the text. The comparative analysis must be supported by relevant examples from the texts.
4 out of 5: The candidate understands the audience and purpose of both texts to a good degree. References are sound. It is more than adequate, but the candidate has not done enough, especially in terms of comparing and contrasting the two texts, to reach the top band of this criterion.
Criterion B - Understanding of the use and effects of stylistic features - 5 marks
The comparative analysis should show an understanding of how various stylistic features, such as tone, style and structure, are used to construct meaning. The analysis should comment on the effects that these features have on their target audience.
3 out of 5: While there is good identification of various stylistic features, the discussion and analysis of their effects are only adequate. In other words, the second half of the criterion, or a "detailed understanding of their effects," is not yet achieved.
Criterion C - Organization and development - 5 marks
The analysis must be well-balanced, meaning that it treats both texts equally. Furthermore, it must be well-structured, coherent and organized.
4 out of 5: This is an organized comparative commentary with a clear beginning, middle, and end. It is balanced with a good sense of development; however, there could be even greater attention paid to the development of the ideas and how they are argued.
Criterion D - Language - 5 marks
The language of the comparative analysis must be clear and accurate. It should be appropriate, meaning it contains formal sentence structure, good choice of words and effective terminology.
4 out of 5: Clear vocabulary that strikes the right register for a comparative commentary with a good degree of grammatical accuracy.